Cowboy Confessional

Guy Smith – writer, songwriter, political provocateur

Journal-less

Email This Post Email This Post Print This Post Print This Post

Everybody is the media.

Like any ecosystem, the media cannot be destroyed, but it does evolve.  Subjective are all opinions if new ecosystems are preferable to older ones (for example, would Greenland prefer to be green again, as when it was first discovered).  Bacteria thriving in a cesspool might well object to humans adding disinfectant.

Likewise with liberals, reporters and the media. Being a fan and occasional participant in the old media, I marvel at how the bacteria therein are rapidly being eaten by a new bug.

Editors attest that people are hungry for content.  In days gone by that content came from a small set of providers.  Before FM radio was wide spread, people received their daily world view from three major broadcast networks (ABC, NBC and the Communist Broadcasting System), whatever local newspapers existed (two if you lived in a big town), and a spider web of rumor passed along by friends, family and traveling salesmen (who also passed along many cases of pregnancy).  The media microorganism was hearty and it readily converted facts into a smelly and somewhat toxic paste for the public.  Then FM radio emptied the AM bands, and in a fight for survival, the amplitude airwaves turned to talk.

The media ecosystem was forever altered.

This cannot be ignored.  Some surveys indicate that American’s think of themselves politically as slightly right of center, whereas university studies have quantified that the old media is largely left.  The slightly conservative citizenry knew they were being brought bogus bulletins and broadcasts, but lacked a cheap means for promoting alternative insights.  Center-right mavens discovered the empty and inexpensive AM bands, and there they found their own idyllic pond.  A new bug was born and it soon evolved into an organism that stole food from the old organisms.

Such is the nature of ecosystems.  Small, furry mammals have better survival odds than dinosaurs when their ecosystem suddenly changes.

The funny thing about people and other organisms is that genetic code is very unique for each individual.  Old media may be to the left of Mao and talk radio may be to the right of Attila, but every audience member is their own species.  Both of the primarily political parties, and the old media are found of false dualities:  left vs. right, Republican vs. Democrat, sane vs. Chuck Schumer.  Such bogus bifurcation is a natty narrative; simple yet entirely insufficient.

Next, the Internet became universal, and the media ecosystem suddenly changed again with the influx of several billion new bacteria.  You.

Old media microbes are vanishing as if the body politic just received a double cheek full of antibiotics.  Network news programs have falling ratings, accelerated to breakneck speeds by Diane Sawyer (ABC needs to get their money back on that failed investment).  Some 24 hour news channels are evaporating in a cloud of their own boorish ineptitude (that would be MSNBC and their gracious and unbiased hosts Keith “Ag School” Oberman and Chris “Sciatica” Matthews).  Newspapers, caught between high per-unit costs and declining ad revenues, are going bankrupt faster than politician morals.  Food in the media ecosystem is being swallowed by the ravenous new species, internetum upsetium.

Now the original media bacilli wants a new food source.  You.

An odd collection of voices are rising with the abhorrent suggestion that the government bail-out the old media.  Since the media’s primary mission is to investigate the government, The People ratified The Bill of Rights with the intent of separating government and press.  For a couple of centuries, the two constantly fought and denigrated one another when not copulating.  It was an ugly but semi-functional relationship.  Like a horny lad, the government attempted to romance and set up residence in the media’s drawers.  Like a young lass, the media teased the government, letting it cop the occasional literary feel while getting a free ride with insider info.  The rest of the time was spent in antagonistic reprisal, which largely keep them off the streets and out of trouble.  Now the older media is dying off, and some think the right response is to arrange marriage between the troubling government and media teens.

We all know how well teenage shotgun marriages work out.

As is often the case, false woes are erected in order to panic the populace.  Some claim that without local newspapers, there will be no checks on local government.  Oddly local weekly newspapers, ones that still have plenty of advertisers, conduct some of the better investigative journalism in the modern era.  Add in local television, whistle blowers, and the new legions of internet enabled part-time investigators, and there appears to be plenty of compensation.  What reporters are really worried about is the pay cuts they’ll take to work for the weeklies.

Journalist fearing breadlines is understandable and forgivable.  What isn’t are the anti-intellectuals called “progressives” who actively promote government funded – and hence, controlled – media.  No less than The Nation (and there are none less than that rag) have called for $60 billion in newspaper resurrection and other forms of corporate welfare.  In the name of “quality journalism”, as opposed to the type you create and consume, they incorrectly assumed that a lack of major media means a lack of journalism.

As noted above, a lack of major media means a lack of center-left hack reporting.  In other words, The Nation seeks to keep their philosophical mouthpiece in place.  It is difficult to push a leftist agenda when The Nation is one of it’s few remaining voices, and one I suspect is falling as fast as newspapers.  It is even harder when the center-right populace, outfitted for information and furiously blogging their fingers to bony nubs, routinely contradicts The Nation’s weekly waste.

Despite some short-term shortcomings, more voices and more investigators means better journalism.  If nothing else, the Internet cross connects data, making it easy for even inebriated reporters (forgive the redundancy) to find information.  Many journalists admit to reading the Drudge Report every morning to triangulate what is important to know that day.  With several million perpetually publishing people, many experts in their own fields and many with insider information, news outlets have a greater scope of information than they had before, and their reporting is fact checked by the public.  The American media ecosystem is not dying – it is changing and getting stronger.

Everybody is the media.  Now get to work.


About The Author

Erudite cowboy, writer, songwriter, political provocateur

Comments

One Response to “Journal-less”

  1. angela says:

    It is marvelous, and because people write for fun rather than money they have no need to tailor their views to suit their employer’s political agendas. It’s more there out of an honest desire to find out and spread relevant information. I think a good recent example of how effective the internet can be at spreading information quickly would be the recent climate-gate scandal.

    Then there are the possibilities of using the internet to mobilize social change or revolution, for instance movements such as the coffee party which sprung from facebook. The internet unifies and empowers people, as if giving us a common language, like a modern day Tower of Babel from the bible, but in reverse – where God was displeased because the people had found their voice – ‘And the Lord said, Behold, the people is one, and they have all one language; and this they begin to do; and now nothing will be restrained from them, which they have imagined to do. Go to, let us go down, and there confound their language, that they may not understand one another’s speech. 8 So the Lord scattered them abroad from thence upon the face of all the earth: and they left off to build the city. 9 Therefore is the name of it called Babel; because the Lord did there confound the language of all the earth: and from thence did the Lord scatter them abroad upon the face of all the earth.’
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tower_of_Babel

    I’m quite surprised the internet has been tolerated so well by the authorities, for instance in the UK the government is aiming to get 7.5 million citizens who don’t currently use the internet online by 2014, specifically targeting senior citizens and low-income families. Even my mother now has the internet who lives off grid, in a cave, in a remote part of the Canary Islands, if she can find her voice on the internet anyone can.

    Then there are the more whacky ideas of Terrence Mckenna and Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, whereby the ability of the internet to bring information and people together is seen as part of a dynamic which will bring about a kind of singularity. In the Law of Complexity/Consciousness Teilhard says –

    “that at all times and everywhere, matter is endeavoring to complexify upon itself, as observed in the evolutionary history of the earth. Matter complexified from inanimate matter, to plant-life, to animal-life, to human-life. Or, from the geosphere, to the biosphere, to the noosphere (of which humans represented, because of their possession of a consciousness which reflects upon themselves). As evolution rises through the biosphere, geosphere and noosphere, matter continues to rise in a continual increase of both complexity and consciousness.

    For Teilhard, the Law of Complexity/Consciousness continues to run today in the form of the socialization of mankind. The closed and circular surface of the earth contributes to the increased compression (socialization) of mankind. As human beings continue to come into closer contact with one another, their methods of interaction continue to complexify in the form of better organized social networks, which contributes to an overall increase in consciousness, or the noosphere.

    Teilhard imagines a critical threshold, Omega Point, in which mankind will have reached its highest point of complexification (socialization) and thus its highest point of consciousness. At this point consciousness will rupture through time and space and assert itself on a higher plane of existence from which it can not come back.”!

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_Complexity/Consciousness

Leave a Reply

If you have polite and articulate comments, please provide them. Rants and flames are discarded.

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free