http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_sock_puppet#Strawman_sockpuppet

Either that or this is a wind-up, best descibed as ‘bunkum’.

Maybe one of the worst foreign policies was the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, considering that other people were already living there.

Millions might have died anyway -

‘Most historians believe that Chamberlain, in holding to these views, pursued the policy of appeasement far longer than was justifiable, but it is not exactly clear whether any course could have averted war, and whether the outcome would have been any better had armed hostilities begun earlier, given that France, as well, was unwilling to commit its forces, and there were no other effective allies:’

‘He actually blames Jews for everything (of which he is obviously one), not feminists and hippies, he believes feminism and the counterculture are creations of the Jewish elite to further their cause of total world domination. His message is Jews have been behind every social system and major movement and have manipulated and greatly profited from most of the wars of the last 300 years. He believes movements like feminism are designed to break down families, weaken our communities and further isolate us from each other. As far as he’s concerned a new world order is being constructed and has been in the pipeline for hundreds of years, the British and American empires have been Jewish conspiracies, the Jewish elite own all the banks, invented fractional banking to enslave governments, intermarried with European monarchies, bought up all the major corporations, dominate world media and use their institutions and secret societies like the Freemasons to initiate Goyims into positions of power where they further the cause of Jewish hegemony and Zionism.’

It just seems that the jews are very touchy and insecure.

Of all the people I met in India, the israelis were by far the most insular and arrogant, and this was obvious to everyone.

And from what I can gather in germany, they were very unpopular money-lenders.

‘..haggling with an aggressive enemy is rarely a smart strategy.’

But I think there is a big difference between ‘talking’ and ‘negotiating’. Surely there is nearly always common ground between people and this can be found through talk. In my expereince it is better to talk than harbour resentments and misunderstandings.

It seems to me – and I’m probably wrong – that a lot of problems are caused by a simple lack of communication.
At least President Ahmadinejad made an effort to talk to america – http://mwcnews.net/content/view/16983/42/

The trouble seems to be when talking becomes exaggerated and sensationalised spin, which is misunderstood by the ignorant.

Chamberlain talking to Hitler is one example in history, but every situation is different.

Maybe wikipedia has a more balanced and less sensational way of saying things –

‘One of his most controversial statements was one in which, according to some translations, he called for Israel to be “wiped off the map,” but interpretations of this statement vary widely.’