Cowboy Confessional

Guy Smith – writer, songwriter, political provocateur

Welcome ... and beware

Welcome to the virtual home of Guy Smith, a San Francisco based writer, songwriter and political provocateur. Herein are essays – collecting like literary dust bunnies – covering topics, ranging wide, from macro economics to sex in San Francisco streets to shameless self-promotion of my books and speaking engagements. Strap in tiger … this blog can be a bumpy ride (so is his Twitter feed @guyshomenet).

Classless Warfare

Posted By on May 14, 2012

Email This Post Email This Post Print This Post Print This Post

If there was any doubt that the 2012 presidential election would be a class warfare fight, this San Francisco bumper sticker eliminates all doubt.

Orchestrated from the top levels, the triangulation of false anger against the wealthy by irrationally tying the rich to bailed-out banks is the cornerstone of Obama’s backward campaign. People who appreciate government handouts but who are not yet getting their free ride have enlisted in Barack’s Brigades. People of non-libertarian intent, who choose to enslave their neighbors using IRS chains, dance around the woodpile of the wealthy intent on lighting fires.

One tell on this bumper is the source the 99% sticker, namely the Communications Workers of America (a union, and as such an organization that appreciates laws that work only in their favor). The CAN perpetuates Occupy Wall Street’s propaganda and insists that people who were lucky, smart or hardworking enough to make a buck give it to them.

The tables should be turned and an example of force for finance be levied upon those who love warfare against 1% of the population. Perhaps at their next rally a group of locals can erect a fence around OWS and CAN protesters, then charge them an exit fee.

Stinkin’ Guns

Posted By on May 5, 2012

Email This Post Email This Post Print This Post Print This Post

While the United States “Justice” Department is running guns into Mexico against the policies of that failed nation, the source of violence in Mexico – the drug cartels  – run unchecked and they resort to terrorizing modes that require no guns.

Click For Larger Picture

Overnight the cartels battling in Nuevo Laredo strung-up 23 people from a bridge, which made the morning commute a bit more scenic. To reenforce the point that they, and not the government, are in control of the region an additional 14 severed heads were tossed onto the steps of city hall.

Call it a strong suggestion on their part.

These nearly daily instances will not detour Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama in their lonely push to enact gun control via treaty. Mexico and other questionable governments in Latin America uniformly restricted firearm access with the CIFTA treaty, which Obama seeks to ratify here.  This certainly has rasied survival barriers for citizens though the cartels continue to acquire military arms from defeated revolutionary groups thruohout the region.

Like incompetent doctors, Barry and Hillary look to treat minor symptoms instead of curing the disease. The cancer is cartels that have powerful profit motivations and know death to be a practical bargaining tool. Until such time as the profit motive is removed, or until the risk of running drugs grows larger that the cash flow, strange fruits will appear below the border.

CalMD Voting

Posted By on April 30, 2012

Email This Post Email This Post Print This Post Print This Post

A little light jab at a soon to retire congressman who deserves not to retire but to be nailed to the cross.

(http://youtu.be/5DUZxkF6eMg for email recipients)

Empty Analysis

Posted By on April 27, 2012

Email This Post Email This Post Print This Post Print This Post

Today the Associated Press, an outlet not known for accuracy, echoes a government report about how often the Mexican government asks if a firearm they came from theUnited States.

Which, of course, is meaningless.

Barack Obama’s failed attempts to ratify gun control treaties such as CIFTA requires presenting a problem. Despite Obama’s staff smuggling guns to Mexico, Americans realize that the real problem is with drug lords and perhaps even anti-drug laws – not a small number of firearms migrating south (from this report, about one firearm for every 8,400 Mexicans). Hence Obama’s BATFE, the same organization at the heart of federal (and illegal) gun running operations, dumped some raw and insufficient data into the media maelstrom in an attempt to generate some old fashioned hysteria.

We see how well that worked for Al Gore.

Here is the problem. The Mexican government (a.k.a. the failed state) occasionally asks the BATFE to trace serial numbers on some firearms that Mexico confiscates, be they taken from drug lords or citizens attempting to protect themselves from drug lords. This smallish sample is in no way reflective of the arms that drug cartels collect. Worse still is that trace data – in the latest report spanning five years – doesn’t answer some very basic questions:

  • What is the total number of firearms confiscated by Mexican authorities? This report only discusses the ones in which a trace was requested. Are U.S.guns 10% of all those collected or 0.01%?
  • Of the ones not traced, where did they come from?  A lot of surplus revolutionary firearms are coming fromSouth America.
  • What is the age of these firearms? Were they bought in theU.S.last week or fifty years ago?
  •  How many were supplied by theU.S.government, either as police/military support or via Fast and Furious type operations?
  •  How many firearms have been non-confiscated?  InMexicothere is a large overlap between the authorities and drug cartels, so we need to know if a large part of the violence problem is being concealed?
  • Were the confiscated firearm even used criminally? Frankly, any otherwise law abiding Mexican citizen with a gun should be presented a freedom medal and their firearm counted as a homeland defense tool.

Sadly the AP does not (perhaps will not) report on these questions. It is our job to do their job – to keep asking.

Sorry Soros

Posted By on April 16, 2012

Email This Post Email This Post Print This Post Print This Post

It burdens me to agree with George Soros.

For readers unfamiliar with strangers to ethics, George Soros is a man for whom money and corruption are merely matters of daily commerce. The philosophy major turned money changer may soon turn to incarcerated felon for an insider trading conviction, which frankly is small stuff compared to when he nearly crippled the U.K. with his speculator currency trading. Later in life he claimed he would happily spend his entire $22 billion fortune to unelect an American president.

In other words, your run-of-the-mill cretin (and a one-percenter at that).

Yet his insights into economics and the effects of government are in part where he made his billions. Being of European birth and education, he also has suspicions concerning the current financial disarray in which the European Union is now drowning. With public debt growing in deadbeat nations like Portugal, Ireland, Greece and Spain (the PIGS if you will), the EU has launched selective bail-outs to delay the time when these nations will implode. Wealthy EU countries with sounder books (Germany being the EU paternalist) assume austerity measures will be enacted and followed in nations struggling to meet their entitlement commitments.

You know, sustainable stuff like retirement at age 50 with 100% pensions and free medical care.

Soros thinks this may be the beginning of the EU’s end, and it is on this one point we agree.  In spasms of irrationality, better heeled EU countries condemned that increasing debt and inflating the EU currency was the best course of action because the alternative was to allow poorly managed countries to enter bankruptcy and drag the Euro (the EU’s currency) down with them. This is akin to learning you have cancer in your foot and deciding to treat the problem by letting it spread to the rest of your body. The EU sees the treatment more as chemotherapy, but if you have ever sat with a leukemia patient you know what those outcomes are like.

Soros got only one point right – that the EU may likely splinter, with weak countries jettisoned or even a complete dissolving of the federation. However, Soros the magician did not distract his audience enough, because his trick was revealed later when he insisted that public debt was not the problem and more public spending was the solution. His absurd assertion exposes his likely aspiration for governments to cover his bets in the market, or create yet another weakness on which he can profit as he did while nearly crashing the U.K. economy. To wit, Soros said “You can grow out of excessive debt, you cannot shrink out of excessive debt.”

And Rosie O’Donnell can grow her way out of morbid obesity.

According to some number nuts at Reason, countries like Portugal would have to grow their economies more than 13% annually to stay as indebted as they currently are. To pull their debt load down to less fatal levels (60% of GDP) they would need to grow 20% each year for a decade.

Did your paycheck grow 20% last year? Didn’t think so.

Soros’ prescription merely multiplies the number of Euros in circulation, leading to Zimbabwe-style inflation. Toward the end of institutionalized insanity in that African nation, inflation was raging at (this is not a joke) 500,000,000,000% and a loaf of bread cost peasants 10,000,000 Zimbabwean bucks. Soros’ suggestion takes the EU on the same ride, unless the source of the problem – the foot cancers – can be excised. Given the nature of government, politicians and other dysfunctional factions, such surgery is unlikely. The EU economic situation will show massive and continued unemployment and spiraling inflation, much as we experienced in the U.S. under Nixon, Ford and Carter.

Germany, best take the foot off now.